Transport in Cuba
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support in paying for servers. Thank you.
Calendario
May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Categorías
Archivos

Unions in Cuba: Who Do They Defend?

Unions in Cuba: Who Do They Defend?

May 8, 2012

By Samuel Farber*

HAVANA TIMES — In the 1930s, at the height of Stalinist terror, a

Russian miner called Aleksei Grigorievich Stakhanov, became famous – and

infamous – for supposedly having extracted 102 tons of coal in less than

6 hours, exceeding his quota by a factor of 14.

Under the direction and thrust of the Communist Party of the USSR, and,

of course, with the support of the unions totally controlled by the

government, the Stakhanovite movement spread to all industries forcing

the competition for hyper production among workers.

Stakhanovism left a very bitter memory in the political culture of the

USSR and Eastern Europe, analyzed and pictured in the unforgettable film

The Man of Marble, by the Polish film director Andrzej Wajda.

It was that quasi mythical figure of Stakhanov that came to mind when I

read the May Day speech and interview published in Trabajadores (April

29, 2012) with Salvador Vald?s Mesa, general secretary of the

Confederation of Cuban Workers and member of the Political Bureau of the

Cuban Communist Party.

In fact, Vald?s Mesa sounded a lot more like the Head of Personnel of

the Cuban state than a union leader particularly when we consider that

the unions exist to defend the interests of the workers, even in a

supposedly socialist state.

Although in his interview Vald?s Mesa mentioned, almost in passing, the

improvement of working conditions and consumer goods as a goal of his

Confederation, he did not even mention the subject in his May Day

speech. It is clear that the dominant theme in both pronouncements was

his demand for the Cuban workers to work harder and more productively.

A legitimate workers' leader would at least have asked for a salary

increase to protect the Cuban workers from the uninterrupted rise in the

prices of consumer goods. But Vald?s Mesa did nothing of the sort.

Without ifs or buts he declared that there will be no salary increases

"while the country, with the measures that have been adopted, has not

yet reduced payrolls and eliminated undue subsidies and free goods that

conspire against an increase in the productivity of labor."

The union leader did not even demand an improvement in the notoriously

deficient transport system so that the workers could get to work on time

thereby contributing to a rise in productivity.

Neither did he demand that the administrators share in the sacrifices of

the workers and that they also become productive.

To be sure, the union leader defended piecework rates (pay "according to

results") rejecting the well established union principle that opposes

pay by piecework in favor of payment according to time worked.

Vald?s Mesa as well as Raul Castro and other Cuban Communist leaders are

invoking the "principle of socialist distribution" to justify piecework.

The "principle of socialist distribution" refers to pay according to

work (in contrast with the communist principle of distribution according

to needs).

But pay according to work does not necessarily imply piecework.

Compensation according to work can easily and perfectly be established

by counting the hours, days, weeks or months that workers have labored.

It is obvious that in contrast with piecework, from the point of view of

the workers, compensation according to time worked constitutes an

elementary defense against super exploitation by the bosses, in this

case the state being the boss.

Besides, pay for time worked is more compatible with the development of

solidarity among workers, while piecework stimulates competition among

them. Can there be any doubt about which of those would be the choice in

a socialist economy and society truly controlled by the workers in

contrast with an employer state like the Cuban?

Vald?s Mesa also rejects the right to seniority. Throughout the history

of capitalism, genuine unions have insisted in giving priority to the

workers that have worked longest not only to defend the older workers,

for whom it would obviously be more difficult to find a job, but also to

protect all workers from favoritism and the arbitrary behavior of

supervisors and bosses.

But Vald?s Mesa rejects seniority – and ignores any other measures that

would protect black workers and women – on behalf of "suitability,"

precisely the criterion favored by big business in the capitalist

countries when they lay off workers.

Billionaire Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City, where I live,

has undertaken a big campaign to layoff public school teachers without

regard to seniority, supposedly to retain only the "suitable" teachers.

But the real agenda behind this policy is to attack the teachers' union

and weaken the solidarity among its members.

And how is "suitability" to be determined in Cuba? As decided in 2010,

this will be the task of a "Committee of Experts" elected, by a show of

hands, in general workers' assemblies, before which a slate of

candidates jointly elaborated by the enterprise management and the

official union will be submitted.

For anyone aware of the political situation in Cuba, it is obvious that

those elections will be purely cosmetic. It is worth noting that the

government has excluded from the jurisdiction of the Committee of

Experts any decision affecting administrators and political cadres and

leaders.

The work status of those people will be decided by the institutions and

authorities that appointed or elected them.

It is evident that not too many Cuban workers see their official unions

as genuine unions and as a "suitable" instrument for the defense of

their interests, whether inside or outside their workplaces.

Vald?s Mesa implicitly recognizes this when he admits, in the interview

published in Trabajadores, that "there are workers who do not believe in

the union."

It is understandable that for this and other reasons the general

secretary of the official central union is worried about the

Confederation having the "capacity to be a protagonist in the updating

of the economic model."

That is why the official workers' confederation has organized the newly

self-employed people; the union leaders already claim that they have

recruited the great majority of these.

Although we do not yet know for sure what the Confederation is planning

to do with the self-employed Cubans (and quite apart from the fact that

only a minority of these are workers and that the great majority are

proprietors, although of small businesses) is there any doubt that the

main impulse behind this is to control the self-employed just as in the

case of the state workers?

It is very clear that the official workers' confederation and its

affiliate unions are not authentic unions but representatives and allies

of the employer state.

It is also clear that never before has an independent union movement

been as necessary as in the present transition towards a new

exploitation model that will likely lead to numerous protests by workers

and peasants as has happened in China.

What will the nascent independent left in Cuba do in regard to such an

important matter?

—–

(*) Samuel Farber was born and grew up in Cuba and is the author of

numerous articles and books about that country including his most recent

Cuba Since the Revolution of 1959. A Critical Assessment (Haymarket

Books, 2011.)

http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=69480 Tags: China, economy, Raul Castro, school, transport

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *